Skip to content

Updating the SL to match the latest OCM feature of self-service ownership transfers #369

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
chamalabey wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Updating the SL to match the latest OCM feature of self-service ownership transfers #369

chamalabey wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@chamalabey
Copy link
Contributor

@chamalabey chamalabey commented Aug 16, 2025

As per the email announcement with subject [Announcement] Self-service capability to transfer ownership of ROSA Classic clusters through OCM. OCM has the feature to self-service the ownership transfer. Updating the SL

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from Makdaam and Tessg22 August 16, 2025 04:25
geowa4
geowa4 reviewed Aug 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
geowa4
geowa4 reviewed Aug 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@geowa4 geowa4 left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 18, 2025
@chamalabey
Copy link
Contributor Author

chamalabey commented Nov 18, 2025

/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chamalabey
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from geowa4. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@chamalabey: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/checklinks-pr 28ca67d link false /test checklinks-pr

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Makdaam Makdaam Awaiting requested review from Makdaam

@Tessg22 Tessg22 Awaiting requested review from Tessg22

1 more reviewer

@geowa4 geowa4 geowa4 left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@geowa4 geowa4

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@chamalabey @openshift-bot @geowa4